The "War On Christmas": Reality, Myth, Relevant?
Onlookers past by American Atheist demonstration in Santa Monica, Ca.
(Photo Courtesy of
AP)
|
As festive holidays approach, some wonder where is the Christmas spirit? Cases that question whether Christmas is too engrained into public life and push the boundaries of a citizen’s constitutional right to religious freedoms are receiving national spotlight and have increased lately as Christmas nears.
To
give you a visual reader, here are some recent cases that have questioned
Christmas’s place in American life as of late:
- Arkansas Society of Freethinkers complains of the decision of first and second grade teachers at Terry Elementary School to take students to a church performance of "A Charlie Brown Christmas"
- UC Berkeley seeks to ban Salvation Army from Campus due to the organization's alleged homophobic practices.
- The decision of the Santa Monica City Council to end the tradition of erecting nativity scenes or other displays in Palisades Park.
The
case of whether Christmas should be celebrated in private or in public and to
what degree is a relevant topic and most likely will remain in national
interest for years to come. This topic remains a question of one’s own personal
opinion and outlook of what the constitution defines as religious freedom.
The
exact phrasing from the constitution is:
"Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
This
leaves the question on whether there is a war on Christmas or has the public
become too sensitive about the mention of even celebration of certain holidays.
Does the hanging of Christmas ornaments in a public area necessarily qualify
the establishment of a national religion? In my opinion, no one should be
forced to celebrate a certain holiday, but no one should be forced to not be
able to celebrate their holiday as well. Though Christmas celebrates the birth
of the Christian savior Jesus Christ, Christmas also celebrates “reindeer” and
a character named Santa Claus, which is in no way religious. For the case of
the parent suing their child’s school over a voluntary field trip to go see
“It’s Christmas Charlie Brown” is a little ridiculous. During these festive
seasons, the motive is to spread holiday cheer not to force someone to celebrate
a religion. Anyone who has a problem with this topic should re-evaluate what
force and religious prosecution is compared to other countries in the world.